header-logo header-logo

Employment law

25 September 2008
Issue: 7338 / Categories: Case law , Tribunals , Law digest , Employment
printer mail-detail

GFI Holdings Ltd v Camm [2008] All ER (D) 74 (Sep)

An employment tribunal has a broad discretion to stay proceedings before it under r 10(2)(h) of the Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2004 (SI 2004/1861), particularly where there are parallel High Court proceedings arising out of similar facts. It is generally desirable to dispose of High Court actions first where there are issues in both sets of proceedings which are substantially the same.

The factors to be taken into account when determining whether or not a stay is appropriate include the degree of similarity of issues between the two sets of proceedings, the complexity of those issues, the technicality of the evidence, the amount of damages claimed, the need for an orderly disposal of proceedings, and the delay that would be occasioned by postponing the tribunal proceedings.

Issue: 7338 / Categories: Case law , Tribunals , Law digest , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll