header-logo header-logo

25 September 2008
Issue: 7338 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Family
printer mail-detail

Family law

Re W [2008] EWCA Civ 538, [2008] All ER (D) 258 (May)

Before any meeting takes place between the judge and a child in a family case, the following should be considered:

(i) the format, structure, content and purpose of the meeting;

(ii) the role of the judge;

(iii) the participation and presence of others in or at the meeting;

(iv) what is to be passed on to anyone not present or represented at the meeting; (v) how matters asserted by a child to the judge are to be tested;

(vi) whether anything that is not passed on to the parties can be taken into account by the judge; and

(vii) what explanation is to be given to the child before and after the meeting.

Issue: 7338 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll