header-logo header-logo

Employment law

18 September 2008
Issue: 7337 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Employment , In Court
printer mail-detail

Jones v Global Crossing (UK) Telecommunications Ltd [2008] All ER (D) 19 (Sep)

When assessing damages for wrongful dismissal, the court or tribunal is required to assess what the employee would have received had the contract been performed. That requires a calculation of what he would actually have received, ie net of tax.

However, the tax regime has to be taken into account so that the sum which the employee receives as damages, in his hand, is sufficient to enable him to discharge any tax liability that he may have to the Inland Revenue in respect of the sum awarded.

Therefore, the calculation involves taking the first £30,000 (tax free under s 148 of the Income Incorporation Taxes Act 1988) and deducting it from the net figure to which the tribunal has come and then on the balance of that figure, grossing that figure up in order to ascertain what the tax bill is likely to be that the employee will face, having received that sum in his hands.

Issue: 7337 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Employment , In Court
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll