header-logo header-logo

Employment law

18 September 2008
Issue: 7337 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Employment , In Court
printer mail-detail

Jones v Global Crossing (UK) Telecommunications Ltd [2008] All ER (D) 19 (Sep)

When assessing damages for wrongful dismissal, the court or tribunal is required to assess what the employee would have received had the contract been performed. That requires a calculation of what he would actually have received, ie net of tax.

However, the tax regime has to be taken into account so that the sum which the employee receives as damages, in his hand, is sufficient to enable him to discharge any tax liability that he may have to the Inland Revenue in respect of the sum awarded.

Therefore, the calculation involves taking the first £30,000 (tax free under s 148 of the Income Incorporation Taxes Act 1988) and deducting it from the net figure to which the tribunal has come and then on the balance of that figure, grossing that figure up in order to ascertain what the tax bill is likely to be that the employee will face, having received that sum in his hands.

Issue: 7337 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Employment , In Court
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll