header-logo header-logo

Employment law

18 September 2008
Issue: 7337 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Employment , In Court
printer mail-detail

Jones v Global Crossing (UK) Telecommunications Ltd [2008] All ER (D) 19 (Sep)

When assessing damages for wrongful dismissal, the court or tribunal is required to assess what the employee would have received had the contract been performed. That requires a calculation of what he would actually have received, ie net of tax.

However, the tax regime has to be taken into account so that the sum which the employee receives as damages, in his hand, is sufficient to enable him to discharge any tax liability that he may have to the Inland Revenue in respect of the sum awarded.

Therefore, the calculation involves taking the first £30,000 (tax free under s 148 of the Income Incorporation Taxes Act 1988) and deducting it from the net figure to which the tribunal has come and then on the balance of that figure, grossing that figure up in order to ascertain what the tax bill is likely to be that the employee will face, having received that sum in his hands.

Issue: 7337 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Employment , In Court
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll