header-logo header-logo

29 May 2008
Issue: 7323 / Categories: Case law , Public , Legal services , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Civil Litigation

Kilby v Gawith [2008] All ER (D) 248 (May)

The question to be decided was whether there is a discretion under CPR 45.11(1) to allow a success fee once the claimant has entered into a conditional fee agreement.

HELD While CPR r 45.11(1) provides that a claimant “may recover a success fee”, the natural meaning is that a claimant is entitled to claim a success fee. CPR r 45.11(2) provides that the amount of the success fee “shall be” 12.5%, which means that where a success fee is recovered it has to be 12.5%. If the draftsman had intended there to be a discretion to grant a success fee, he would not have fettered that discretion by specifying the amount.

 

Issue: 7323 / Categories: Case law , Public , Legal services , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys further bolsters Private Equity expertise with the appointment of James Paterson

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons strengthens Rural Affairs team with senior appointment

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley adds insurance mergers and acquisitions partner to London office

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll