header-logo header-logo

03 January 2008 / Peter Hungerford-welch
Issue: 7302 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Criminal Litigation

Crown Court [2007] EWHC 2804 (Admin), [2007] All ER (D) 283 (Oct)

 This case concerned extension of the custody time limit under the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985, s 22(3) in circumstances where delay had been caused  by listing difficulties at the crown court. 

 

HELD Where there are real pressures on a court which have been created by exceptional circum­stances, the court should be careful to examine what the reason is and the proposed solution to it and come to a judgment as to whether or not it can properly be said that the reason is one which is exceptional and that the steps that are proposed to alleviate it appear to have a prospect of success (per Lord Justice Latham at para 18).

Issue: 7302 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll