header-logo header-logo

03 January 2008 / Peter Hungerford-welch
Issue: 7302 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Criminal Litigation

Crown Court [2007] EWHC 2804 (Admin), [2007] All ER (D) 283 (Oct)

 This case concerned extension of the custody time limit under the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985, s 22(3) in circumstances where delay had been caused  by listing difficulties at the crown court. 

 

HELD Where there are real pressures on a court which have been created by exceptional circum­stances, the court should be careful to examine what the reason is and the proposed solution to it and come to a judgment as to whether or not it can properly be said that the reason is one which is exceptional and that the steps that are proposed to alleviate it appear to have a prospect of success (per Lord Justice Latham at para 18).

Issue: 7302 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
back-to-top-scroll