header-logo header-logo

03 January 2008 / Peter Hungerford-welch
Issue: 7302 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Criminal Litigation

Crown Court [2007] EWHC 2804 (Admin), [2007] All ER (D) 283 (Oct)

 This case concerned extension of the custody time limit under the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985, s 22(3) in circumstances where delay had been caused  by listing difficulties at the crown court. 

 

HELD Where there are real pressures on a court which have been created by exceptional circum­stances, the court should be careful to examine what the reason is and the proposed solution to it and come to a judgment as to whether or not it can properly be said that the reason is one which is exceptional and that the steps that are proposed to alleviate it appear to have a prospect of success (per Lord Justice Latham at para 18).

Issue: 7302 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Ashurst's Chief Risk Officer joins Walkers

Excello Law—John Osborne

Excello Law—John Osborne

Northern family lawyer John Osborne joins Excello

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

Trio of promotions announced at Kidderminster law firm mfg Solicitors

NEWS
A sole director can conspire with their own company for the purposes of the tort of unlawful means conspiracy, the High Court has ruled in a judgment with potentially wide implications for business disputes
The Court of Appeal has reinforced that domicile depends on intention rather than residence alone, in a significant post-Brexit ruling on cross-border financial remedy claims
The Chancery Division's long history comes to an end this autumn as it is reborn as the Business and Property Division, prompting questions over whether the shake-up is really necessary
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
back-to-top-scroll