header-logo header-logo

Family law

10 July 2008
Issue: 7329 / Categories: Case law , Child law , Law digest , Family
printer mail-detail

Re M (a child) (secure accommodation order) [2008] EWHC 1085 (Fam), [2008] All ER (D) 389 (Jun)

A free standing application cannot be made for an interim secure accommodation order. The power to make an interim order only arises under s 25(5) of the Children Act 1989 if the court adjourns the hearing of the local authority’s application.

The preliminary procedural question for the court on any application for a secure accommodation order is whether to proceed to determine the application or whether to adjourn it. If the court is satisfied it has all the information that it needs to determine the issues raised by the application and that it would be procedurally fair to proceed, then it is likely that there will be no grounds upon which the court can properly adjourn the substan-tive application.

In those circumstances the court must proceed to determine the application for the secure accommodation order. If the court decides to adjourn the application, then the period of adjournment should be the minimum necessary to ensure the factors justifying an adjournment are addressed.

The function and role of the children’s guardian within secure accommodation proceedings is to provide assistance to the court with the issues raised by the application. It is not to oversee the exercise by the local authority of its statutory duties, nor to perform a free-standing welfare role for the benefit of the child.

Issue: 7329 / Categories: Case law , Child law , Law digest , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll