header-logo header-logo

10 July 2008
Issue: 7329 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

Immigration

EB (Kosovo) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 41, [2008] All ER (D) 334 (Jun)

There is no specified period within which an immigration decision must be made. It does not, however, follow that delay in the decision-making process is necessarily irrelevant to the decision.

The applicant may, during the period of any delay, develop closer personal and social ties and establish deeper roots in the community than he could have shown earlier.

Any relationship into which the applicant has entered will lose its sense of impermanence and the expectation will grow that if the authorities had intended to remove the applicant they would have taken steps to do so, thus affecting the proportionality of removal.

Delay may also be relevant if it is shown to be the result of a dysfunctional system which yields unpredictable, inconsistent and unfair outcomes.

Issue: 7329 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll