header-logo header-logo

Immigration

10 July 2008
Issue: 7329 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

EB (Kosovo) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 41, [2008] All ER (D) 334 (Jun)

There is no specified period within which an immigration decision must be made. It does not, however, follow that delay in the decision-making process is necessarily irrelevant to the decision.

The applicant may, during the period of any delay, develop closer personal and social ties and establish deeper roots in the community than he could have shown earlier.

Any relationship into which the applicant has entered will lose its sense of impermanence and the expectation will grow that if the authorities had intended to remove the applicant they would have taken steps to do so, thus affecting the proportionality of removal.

Delay may also be relevant if it is shown to be the result of a dysfunctional system which yields unpredictable, inconsistent and unfair outcomes.

Issue: 7329 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll