header-logo header-logo

10 July 2008
Issue: 7329 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

Immigration

EB (Kosovo) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 41, [2008] All ER (D) 334 (Jun)

There is no specified period within which an immigration decision must be made. It does not, however, follow that delay in the decision-making process is necessarily irrelevant to the decision.

The applicant may, during the period of any delay, develop closer personal and social ties and establish deeper roots in the community than he could have shown earlier.

Any relationship into which the applicant has entered will lose its sense of impermanence and the expectation will grow that if the authorities had intended to remove the applicant they would have taken steps to do so, thus affecting the proportionality of removal.

Delay may also be relevant if it is shown to be the result of a dysfunctional system which yields unpredictable, inconsistent and unfair outcomes.

Issue: 7329 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
The controversial Mazur ruling, which caused widespread uncertainty about the role of non-solicitors in litigation work, has been overturned on appeal
Two landmark social media cases in the US could influence social media regulation in the UK, lawyers predict
Barristers have urged the government to set up Nightingale-style specialist courts, with jury trials, to prioritise rape, sexual assault and domestic abuse trials
Victims of violent crimes who suffer life-changing injuries receive less than half the financial support today than those in the 1990s, according to a senior personal injury lawyer
Rising numbers of cases, an increase in litigants in person and an overall lack of investment is piling pressure on the family court, the Law Society has warned
back-to-top-scroll