header-logo header-logo

10 July 2008
Issue: 7329 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Judicial Review

R (Lewis) v Persimmon Homes Teesside Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 746, [2008] All ER (D) 11 (Jul)

Apparent bias or predetermination on the part of a planning authority does not render the grant of planning permission unlawful unless the authority made its decision with a closed mind.

It is for the court to assess whether or not committee members did make the decision with closed minds or that the circumstances give rise to such a real risk of closed minds that the decision ought not in the public interest be upheld. However, the importance of appearances is generally more limited in this context than in a judicial context.

Issue: 7329 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Constantine Law—Anita Vadgama

Constantine Law—Anita Vadgama

New senior partner hire at consultant-led employment / regulatory law firm

Ward Hadaway—Emma Swann & Jill Donabie

Ward Hadaway—Emma Swann & Jill Donabie

Firm adds two partners to growing education practice

mfg Solicitors—Lauren Collins, Emily Stancer & Sara Southall

mfg Solicitors—Lauren Collins, Emily Stancer & Sara Southall

Trio of newly qualified solicitors strengthens Worcester office law firm

NEWS
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
The treasury has sought to reassure the legal profession over concerns about cost, bureaucracy and independence when the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) takes over regulation of anti-money laundering compliance
One out of two barristers has come under pressure from clients to act unethically, according to the results of this year’s Barristers’ Working Lives survey
The Court of Appeal has held the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) was wrong to set aside a Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) decision on unfair pricing of phenytoin, an epilepsy drug
A flagship employment law reform is due to come into effect on 1 July, extending unfair dismissal rights to employees after six months in their job instead of two years
back-to-top-scroll