header-logo header-logo

Family Law

03 January 2008
Issue: 7302 / Categories: Case law , Child law , Law digest , Family
printer mail-detail

Re C (A Child)(Adoption: Local Authority’s Duty) [2007] EWCA Civ 1206, [2007] All ER (D) 368 (Nov)

 

When a decision has to be made about the long-term care of a child, whom a mother wishes to make enquiries which it is not in the interests of the child to make. Enquiries are not in the interests of the child simply because they will pro­vide more informa­tion about the child’s background: they must genuinely further the prospect of finding a long-term carer for the child without delay.

 

Section 1 of the Adoption and Children Act 2002 does not estab­lish any preference for any particular result or prescribe any particular conclusion. It does not express a preference for following the wishes of the birth family or placing a child with the child’s birth family, though this will often be in the best interests of the child. In some cases, the birth tie will be very important, especially where the child is of an age to understand what is happening or where there are ethnic or cultural or religious reasons for keeping the child in the birth family.

 

Where a child has never lived with the birth fam­ily, and is too young to understand what is going on, that argument must be weaker. In such a case, it is (absent any application by any member of the family, which succeeds) overtaken by the need to find the child a permanent home as soon as that can be done.

Issue: 7302 / Categories: Case law , Child law , Law digest , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Head of corporate promoted to director

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Firm strengthens international arbitration team with key London hire

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

NEWS
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
back-to-top-scroll