header-logo header-logo

Employment law

12 June 2008
Issue: 7325 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Employment
printer mail-detail

Jurkowska v Hlmad Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 231, [2008] IRLR 430

The introduction into the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) rules of the “overriding objective... to deal with cases justly” does not mean that the EAT must adopt a more relaxed approach to the extension of the 42-day time limit for appealing than that set out by the EAT in United Arab Emirates v Abdelghafar [1995] ICR 65, [1995] IRLR 243.

It will only be in rare and exceptional cases that it will be appropriate to extend time. The principles identified in Abdelghafar remain good law, although they are guidelines and every case will turn on its facts. The decision whether to extend time is pre-eminently a discretionary one for the judge. In the ordinary run of cases, it will be necessary for a good excuse for the delay to be shown. However, even if the explanation does not amount to a good excuse, there may be exceptional circumstances which still justify an extension.

Issue: 7325 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll