header-logo header-logo

11 December 2008
Issue: 7349 / Categories: Features , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail

Law digest: 12 December 2008

Peter Hungerford-Welch, associate dean, The City  Law School, City University London. Wwww.city.ac.uk/law

Patents

Blacklight Power Inc v Comptroller-General of Patents [2008] EWHC 2763 (Pat), [2008] All ER (D) 183 (Nov)

The standard of proof that an applicant is required to satisfy to establish patentability is the balance of probabilities. If the comptroller considers that there is a substantial doubt about an issue of fact which could lead to patentability, he should consider whether there is a reasonable prospect that matters will turn out differently if the matter is fully investigated at a trial; if so he should allow the application to proceed.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
back-to-top-scroll