header-logo header-logo

Employment Law

01 May 2008
Issue: 7319 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Ashcroft v Haberdashers’ Aske’s Boys’ School [2008] IRLR 375 (EAT)

The claimant was informed of the unsuccessful outcome of his internal appeal against dismissal some six hours before the three-month time time-limit for presenting a claim to the tribunal (under s 111 of the Employment Rights act 1996) expired.

Since there was no appeal pending when the time limit expired, reg 15(2) of the Employment Act 2002 (Dispute Resolution) Regulations 2004 (SI 2004/ 752) (which provides for an automatic three-month extension of the time limit where a statutory procedure is being followed when the time limit expires) did not apply.

HELD The effect of the 2004 Regulations is to encourage the employee not to bring proceedings pending the outcome of an internal appeal. Regulation 15(2) is predicated upon the assumption that there will not be an application to the employment tribunal prior to the expiry of the appeal period, and so overtakes the position established by Palmer v Southend-on-Sea Borough Council [1984] IRLR 119.

The tribunal should therefore have found that it was not reasonably practicable for the claimant to have presented his claim (the case was remitted for the tribunal to consider whether the claim had been submitted within a reasonable period thereafter).

Issue: 7319 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll