header-logo header-logo

01 May 2008
Issue: 7319 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Employment law

Al Jumard v Clywd Leisure Ltd [2008] IRLR 345

The Employment Appeal Tribunal gave guidance on damages for injury to feelings in discrimination cases: where more than one form of discrimination arises out of the same facts, it can be artificial to ask to what extent each discrete head of discrimination has contributed to the injured feelings, and there will be no error of law where the tribunal does not do that.

Where discriminatory heads overlap, it is not appropriate to treat each form of discrimination independently and then add the sum for each. At the end of the exercise the tribunal must stand back and have regard to the overall magnitude of the global sum to ensure that it is proportionate, and that there is no double counting in the calculation.

Issue: 7319 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll