header-logo header-logo

01 May 2008
Issue: 7319 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Proceeds of crime

R v Newman [2008] EWCA Crim 816, [2008] All ER (D) 266 (Apr)

A person obtained a benefit, pursuant s 76(4) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, if he received property, even if he did not retain it, or if the property was in fact controlled by another on his behalf, or controlled by that other for him and the other person jointly.

If A arranged for property to be transferred to B, who was acting as his nominee and the property remained under A’s control, then A had obtained an interest in it, provided that there was control of it.

Issue: 7319 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sackers—Zak Ullah

Sackers—Zak Ullah

Sackers welcomes new associate

Christy Davies—Birmingham Law Society

Christy Davies—Birmingham Law Society

Ward Hadaway lawyer joins Birmingham Law Society Council

Ellisons—Stephanie Westwood & Anisa Khan

Ellisons—Stephanie Westwood & Anisa Khan

Ellisons expands Chelmsford commercial litigation team with two appointments

NEWS
Construction workers injured in comparable accidents can face sharply different routes to compensation on opposite sides of the Atlantic
Victims of undue influence may have more options than simply unwinding a tainted transaction, with courts able to order profits accounts, compensation and, exceptionally, severance
Disabled people could lose vital safeguards following the Supreme Court’s reversal of the Cheshire West test for deprivation of liberty, two barristers warn
A formidable reputation cannot protect a law firm when partner departures, fragile finances and client uncertainty begin feeding each other
Businesses incorporating open-source software into commercial products could face obligations to disclose valuable source code, with AI-assisted development making licensing risks harder to track
back-to-top-scroll