header-logo header-logo

13 November 2026
Issue: 8185 / Categories: Legal News , Construction , Personal injury , Compensation , Liability , International , Employment
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Same fall, different claim

264137
© Getty images
Construction workers injured in comparable accidents can face sharply different routes to compensation on opposite sides of the Atlantic

Writing in NLJ this week, attorney Lindsey Sasson, who specialises in complex civil litigation, compares employer liability, safety regulation and damages in the US and England and Wales.

American workers generally receive no-fault workers’ compensation benefits but cannot sue their employer in tort. Full recovery usually depends on claims against third parties, such as contractors, property owners or equipment manufacturers.

Sasson describes this exclusivity bar as ‘the most consequential structural feature distinguishing the two systems’. English workers can sue employers directly in negligence, backed by compulsory liability insurance.

New York’s Scaffold Law adds distinctive protection against gravity-related hazards, including some crane accidents, although an accident alone does not establish liability.

Regulatory breaches can provide evidence without automatically establishing civil liability. US damages can reach eight figures, while English awards follow a more predictable framework.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carter-Ruck—Tomas Vail

Carter-Ruck—Tomas Vail

Carter-Ruck strengthens International team with appointment of arbitration partner Tomas Vail

Slater Heelis—Nick Terry

Slater Heelis—Nick Terry

Slater Heelis strengthens crime and regulatory team with appointment of Nick Terry as partner

Payne Hicks Beach—Thomas Moran & Sarah Gogan

Payne Hicks Beach—Thomas Moran & Sarah Gogan

Payne Hicks Beach strengthens private wealth offering with appointment of two new partners

NEWS
Construction workers injured in comparable accidents can face sharply different routes to compensation on opposite sides of the Atlantic
Victims of undue influence may have more options than simply unwinding a tainted transaction, with courts able to order profits accounts, compensation and, exceptionally, severance
Disabled people could lose vital safeguards following the Supreme Court’s reversal of the Cheshire West test for deprivation of liberty, two barristers warn
A formidable reputation cannot protect a law firm when partner departures, fragile finances and client uncertainty begin feeding each other
Businesses incorporating open-source software into commercial products could face obligations to disclose valuable source code, with AI-assisted development making licensing risks harder to track
back-to-top-scroll