header-logo header-logo

ARBITRATION

08 February 2007
Issue: 7259 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Fiona Trust & Holding Corporation v Privalov [2007] EWCA Civ 20, [2007] All ER (D) 169 (Jan)

(i) Any jurisdiction or arbitration clause in an international commercial contract should be construed liberally. The words “arising under the contract” should cover every dispute except a dispute about whether there was ever a contract at all. Although in the past such words have sometimes been given a narrower meaning, that should no longer continue to be so.

(ii) An allegation of invalidity of a contract does not prevent the invalidity question being determined by an arbitration tribunal pursuant to the arbitration agreement. It is only if the arbitration agreement itself is directly impeached for some specific reason that the tribunal would be prevented from deciding the disputes that relate to the main contract.

Issue: 7259 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll