header-logo header-logo

29 November 2007
Issue: 7299 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Employment Law

Williams v Optical Express Ltd [2007] All ER (D) 416 (Oct)

Where an employer faced with a redundancy situation imposes changes on an employee which amount to a fundamental breach, the employee is entitlement to a redundancy payment if he resigns after working under protest for a reasonable trial period.

However, where there is an offer and acceptance of a new contract of employment by reference to the four-week trial period in the Employment Rights Act 1996, s 138 an employee cannot rely on the original dismissal or constructive dismissal to claim a redundancy payment unless, within the trial period, he exercises the rights given by ss 138(2) and (3) to terminate the contract.

Issue: 7299 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Kevin Joynes & Neil Gosling

Clarke Willmott—Kevin Joynes & Neil Gosling

Clarke Willmott bolsters housebuilder expertise in Birmingham

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Firm adds former Simmons Simmons patent head to engineering and tech team

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

Freeths strengthens its voice in national disputes with ACTAPS committee appointment

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll