header-logo header-logo

LANDLORD AND TENANT

15 November 2007
Issue: 7297 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Wandsworth London Borough Council v Randall [2007] EWCA Civ 1126, [2007] All ER (D) 98 (Nov

An order for possession could not be made under ground 16 of Pt III of Sch 2 to the Housing Act 1985 unless three conditions are satisfied:

(i) the accommodation afforded by the dwelling-house is more extensive than was reasonably required by the tenant;

(ii) the court is satisfied that suitable accommodation would be available for the tenant when the order takes effect; and

(iii) the court considers it reasonable to make the order.The reasonableness test requires consideration of all the relevant circumstances existing at the date of the hearing. 

As regards the second condition, s 84(2)(c) clearly provides that the date when the order takes effect is the date at which the court has to be satisfied that the suitable accommodation “will be available”. As to the first condition, it is clear that the requirements are to be judged at the date of the hearing. It follows that the relevant date for determining the composition of the successor tenant’s family was not the date of succession, but the date of the possession hearing.

Issue: 7297 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll