header-logo header-logo

04 October 2007
Issue: 7291 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

CRIMINAL LITIGATION

R (on the application of Leask) v South Western Magistrates Court [2007] EWHC 1233 (Admin), [2007] All ER (D) 142 (May)

The court had to consider an extension of the time limit for submission of a bill of costs under the Costs in Criminal Cases (General) Regulations 1986, reg 12(2).

It was held that two separate aspects have to be considered: (i) whether the failure to comply with a time limit was without good reason or whether a good reason existed; and (ii) whether or not exceptional circumstances existed which would justify the extension of the time limit.

The fact that there was no good reason, or that the reason for failure was not a good one, does not preclude there being exceptional circumstances; each aspect has to be considered separately.

Issue: 7291 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll