header-logo header-logo

04 October 2007
Issue: 7291 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

CRIMINAL LITIGATION

R (on the application of Leask) v South Western Magistrates Court [2007] EWHC 1233 (Admin), [2007] All ER (D) 142 (May)

The court had to consider an extension of the time limit for submission of a bill of costs under the Costs in Criminal Cases (General) Regulations 1986, reg 12(2).

It was held that two separate aspects have to be considered: (i) whether the failure to comply with a time limit was without good reason or whether a good reason existed; and (ii) whether or not exceptional circumstances existed which would justify the extension of the time limit.

The fact that there was no good reason, or that the reason for failure was not a good one, does not preclude there being exceptional circumstances; each aspect has to be considered separately.

Issue: 7291 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
More than 100 teams from the legal and financial services sectors competed in five sports at the 51st Law Society RFC Festival of Sport earlier this month
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
Britain’s new acknowledgement that Israel’s occupation is unlawful, and accompanying settlement-goods ban and sanctions, is significant but overdue, argue Danny Friedman KC and Victor Kattan in NLJ this week
New planning fee rises, wider trade union access rights and a service-by-email trap feature in Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
back-to-top-scroll