header-logo header-logo

04 October 2007
Issue: 7291 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

CRIMINAL LITIGATION

R (on the application of A) v South Yorkshire Police [2007] EWHC 1261 (Admin), [2007] All ER (D) 233 (Jul)

A number of juveniles sought to challenge the decision to charge them rather than give a final warning under the Crime and Disorder Act 1998, s 65. They argued that the decision contravened the relevant Home Office Circular (14/2006).

It was held that the court should not intervene unless it is clearly established that the decision to prosecute the defendants came about as a result of a departure from the statutory guidance and there is no rational explanation for that departure; even then, any intervention by the court would be discretionary.

The ultimate question for decision is whether or not the decision to prosecute is sustainable.

Issue: 7291 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll