header-logo header-logo

CRIMINAL LITIGATION

16 August 2007
Issue: 7286 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

R (Kelly) v Warley Magistrates’ Court [2007] EWHC 1836 (Admin), [2007] All ER (D) 506 (Jul)

The defence was ordered—under Pt 3.10 of the Criminal Procedure Rules—to supply the full names, dates of birth and addresses of all defence witnesses to be called at trial.

The defendant applied to have the direction quashed. It was held that the subject matter of the direction was covered by both litigation privilege and legal professional privilege, and the court did not have power to override them.

Such a requirement would require statutory authority, and the relevant provisions of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 have not yet been brought into force.

Issue: 7286 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll