header-logo header-logo

26 July 2007
Issue: 7283 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

CRIMINAL LITIGATION

R (on the application of Culley) v Dorchester Crown Court [2007] EWHC 109 (Admin), [2007] All ER (D) 295 (Jan)

The procedure for dealing with breach of bail conditions laid down in the Bail Act 1976, ss 7 (4) and (5) is subject to a strict time limit of 24 hours, following the arrest of the claimant. It  follows that the justice is required to complete his investigation and decision-making in relation to this matter within the 24-hour period.

If the justice fails to do so, the continued detention of the accused becomes unlawful from the moment 24 hours have elapsed since his arrest. Any order to remand the accused in custody after the expiry of the 24-hour period is therefore ultra vires and unlawful.

Issue: 7283 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Ashurst's Chief Risk Officer joins Walkers

Excello Law—John Osborne

Excello Law—John Osborne

Northern family lawyer John Osborne joins Excello

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

Trio of promotions announced at Kidderminster law firm mfg Solicitors

NEWS
A sole director can conspire with their own company for the purposes of the tort of unlawful means conspiracy, the High Court has ruled in a judgment with potentially wide implications for business disputes
The Court of Appeal has reinforced that domicile depends on intention rather than residence alone, in a significant post-Brexit ruling on cross-border financial remedy claims
The Chancery Division's long history comes to an end this autumn as it is reborn as the Business and Property Division, prompting questions over whether the shake-up is really necessary
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
back-to-top-scroll