header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
12 July 2007
Issue: 7281 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Landlord and Tenant

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Contour Homes Ltd v Rowen [2007] All ER (D) 310 (Jun)

Where an assured tenancy agreement contains a clause providing the machinery for the increase of the rent, the landlord is not required to comply with the rent review procedure set out by s 13 of the Housing Act 1988.

Issue: 7281 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
EIP—Stuart Malcolm

EIP—Stuart Malcolm

EIP strengthens Commercial practice with a new partner

Ellisons—Francesca Brown

Ellisons—Francesca Brown

Ellisons welcomes Francesca Brown to Family team

Shakespeare Martineau—Marie Bourke

Shakespeare Martineau—Marie Bourke

Shakespeare Martineau strengthens Sheffield regulatory practice with new hires

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: A cautionary tale of bankruptcy and digital promises
A wide-ranging Civil Way column highlights developments from insolvency procedure to employment law, but one case stands out for its lessons on bankruptcy, family homes and digital communications
NLJ this week: Trade mark reality check for expanding brands
A sprawling Intellectual Property Office battle between House of Fraser and Frasers Property has delivered a masterclass in modern trade mark law
NLJ this week: Relocation battles demand more than good intentions
Courts in England and Wales and Singapore are increasingly confronting complex disputes over international child relocation as families become more globally mobile
NLJ this week: Domestic abuse reform faces its hardest test
The government’s long-awaited family law reform consultation could mark a turning point for domestic abuse victims navigating financial remedy proceedings, but significant challenges remain
NLJ this week: Open justice push brings experts into the spotlight
A new commercial court pilot giving the public access to documents used in hearings, including expert reports, is raising difficult questions about transparency and privacy
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll