header-logo header-logo

14 June 2007
Issue: 7277 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Civil Evidence

Shierson v Rastogi [2007] EWHC 1266 (Ch), [2007] All ER (D) 446 (May)

A judgment is conclusive, between the parties and their privies, of its existence, date and legal consequences, and it precludes re-litigation of the same cause of action or issue.

To establish what matters were in issue, it is permissible to examine the pleadings and the judgment. However, this rule does not apply where the conclusion of the court in the earlier case was based on evidence adduced at trial which a party in the subsequent case had no opportunity, by himself or his privy, to challenge.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft strengthens Scottish real estate capabilitywith partner appointment

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints Brendan Ryan as partner in Public Law Projects team

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers welcomes five new barristers

NEWS
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
Police powers targeting concealed identities at protests come with procedural conditions that could determine whether prosecutions succeed
back-to-top-scroll