header-logo header-logo

Criminal Evidence

14 June 2007
Issue: 7277 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

R v Musone [2007] EWCA Crim 1237, [2007] All ER (D) 398 (May)

Once evidence of a defendant’s bad character is found to be admissible pursuant to CJA 2003,  s 101(1)(e), that section does not confer any power on the court to exclude that evidence on the grounds of unfairness.

Admissibility under that sub-section depends solely on the court’s assessment of the quality of the evidence. However, the rules made under s 111, in relation to bad character evidence do confer power on the court to exclude such evidence in circumstances where there has been a breach of a prescribed requirement. Cases in which a breach of the procedural rules will entitle a court to exclude evidence of substantial probative value will be rare.

A court should be most reluctant to exclude evidence of that quality by reason of a breach of the procedural code; nonetheless, there will be cases where the only way in which the court can ensure fairness is by excluding evidence, even when it reaches the quality described in s 101(1)(e).

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll