header-logo header-logo

14 June 2007
Issue: 7277 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Criminal Evidence

R v Musone [2007] EWCA Crim 1237, [2007] All ER (D) 398 (May)

Once evidence of a defendant’s bad character is found to be admissible pursuant to CJA 2003,  s 101(1)(e), that section does not confer any power on the court to exclude that evidence on the grounds of unfairness.

Admissibility under that sub-section depends solely on the court’s assessment of the quality of the evidence. However, the rules made under s 111, in relation to bad character evidence do confer power on the court to exclude such evidence in circumstances where there has been a breach of a prescribed requirement. Cases in which a breach of the procedural rules will entitle a court to exclude evidence of substantial probative value will be rare.

A court should be most reluctant to exclude evidence of that quality by reason of a breach of the procedural code; nonetheless, there will be cases where the only way in which the court can ensure fairness is by excluding evidence, even when it reaches the quality described in s 101(1)(e).

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

NEWS
The controversial Courts and Tribunals Bill has passed its second reading by 304 votes to 203, despite concerted opposition from the legal profession
The presumption of parental involvement is to be abolished, the Lord Chancellor David Lammy has confirmed
A highly experienced chartered legal executive has been prevented from representing her client in financial remedies proceedings, in a case that highlights the continued fallout from Mazur
Plans to commandeer 50%-75% of the interest on lawyers’ client accounts to fund the justice system overlook the cost and administrative burden of this on small and medium law firms, CILEX has warned
Lawyers have been asked for their views on proposals to change the penalties for assaulting a police officer
back-to-top-scroll