header-logo header-logo

14 June 2007
Issue: 7277 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Criminal Evidence

R v Musone [2007] EWCA Crim 1237, [2007] All ER (D) 398 (May)

Once evidence of a defendant’s bad character is found to be admissible pursuant to CJA 2003,  s 101(1)(e), that section does not confer any power on the court to exclude that evidence on the grounds of unfairness.

Admissibility under that sub-section depends solely on the court’s assessment of the quality of the evidence. However, the rules made under s 111, in relation to bad character evidence do confer power on the court to exclude such evidence in circumstances where there has been a breach of a prescribed requirement. Cases in which a breach of the procedural rules will entitle a court to exclude evidence of substantial probative value will be rare.

A court should be most reluctant to exclude evidence of that quality by reason of a breach of the procedural code; nonetheless, there will be cases where the only way in which the court can ensure fairness is by excluding evidence, even when it reaches the quality described in s 101(1)(e).

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll