header-logo header-logo

Criminal Evidence

14 June 2007
Issue: 7277 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

R v Musone [2007] EWCA Crim 1237, [2007] All ER (D) 398 (May)

Once evidence of a defendant’s bad character is found to be admissible pursuant to CJA 2003,  s 101(1)(e), that section does not confer any power on the court to exclude that evidence on the grounds of unfairness.

Admissibility under that sub-section depends solely on the court’s assessment of the quality of the evidence. However, the rules made under s 111, in relation to bad character evidence do confer power on the court to exclude such evidence in circumstances where there has been a breach of a prescribed requirement. Cases in which a breach of the procedural rules will entitle a court to exclude evidence of substantial probative value will be rare.

A court should be most reluctant to exclude evidence of that quality by reason of a breach of the procedural code; nonetheless, there will be cases where the only way in which the court can ensure fairness is by excluding evidence, even when it reaches the quality described in s 101(1)(e).

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll