header-logo header-logo

14 June 2007
Issue: 7277 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Habeas Corpus

Hilali v Governor of Whitemoor Prison [2007] EWHC 939 (Admin); [2007] All ER (D) 210 (Apr)

The court gave guidance on the availability habeas corpus, in a case where the defendant was arrested under a European arrest warrant, the statutory extradition process was at an end, but he contended that new information was available undermining the basis on which extradition had been ordered.

Held: in exceptional circumstances, habeas corpus should be available as a remedy additional to the statutory appeals procedure. Where a person has been deprived of his liberty as the result of a decision which is later seen to have been based on a false factual premise, but no appeal procedure is available to restore that person’s liberty, some other process must be available to fill the breach.

In such circumstances (namely, the undermining of the factual premise of the judge’s decision), the further proceedings would not amount to the questioning of the judge’s decision. Rather, the proceedings would be based on the acceptance that the judge’s decision had been correct at the time but

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll