header-logo header-logo

14 June 2007
Issue: 7277 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Legal Profession

CPS v P [2007] EWHC 1144 (Admin)

The court made observations about the practice to be followed by barristers and solicitors in disclosing a draft judgment in the period between their receipt of a judgment in draft form and the date on which it was handed down:

“solicitors should not disclose a draft judgment to other members of their forms or organisations save to the extent necessary for the taking of instructions in respect of the instant case. If any solicitor is in doubt as to the propriety of a particular disclosure, he or she should request permission from the judge concerned … by email to the judge’s clerk” (per Lady Justice Smith at para 15).

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Eversheds Sutherland—Claire Petheram

Eversheds Sutherland—Claire Petheram

Eversheds Sutherland strengthens top-ranked pensions practice with appointment of former global head of pensions

mfg Solicitors—Hannah Finnegan

mfg Solicitors—Hannah Finnegan

Law firm strengthens private client team to support continued growth

Devonshires—Andrew Cromb

Devonshires—Andrew Cromb

Devonshires expands offering with appointment of tax partner Andrew Cromb

NEWS
Mr Justice Nicklin’s decision to order costs on an indemnity basis may be a ‘significant win’ but it’s still ‘far from game, set and match’ for Associated Newspapers, a former costs judge has said
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners
back-to-top-scroll