header-logo header-logo

Motor Insurers’ Bureau

14 June 2007
Issue: 7277 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Byrne v Motor Insurers’ Bureau [2007] EWHC 1268 (QB), [2007] All ER (D) 03 (Jun)

This case concerned the limitation period for the liability of the MIB to satisfy judgments against untraced drivers where the injured party is a minor. This scheme is intended to implement Council Directive (EEC) 84/5. Under the scheme, the limitation period is, in all cases, three years.

Held: the procedure relied on by the UK as implementing the Directive should be subject to a limitation period no less favourable than that which applies to the commencement of proceedings by minors for personal injury in tort against a traced driver (under s 28 of the Limitation Act 1980).

Although the Directive is, in principle, capable of having direct effect, the MIB is not an emanation of the state and so the Directive cannot be enforced directly against it. However, the UK is in sufficiently serious breach of the terms of the Directive so as to give rise, in principle, to a claim for damages.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
back-to-top-scroll