header-logo header-logo

Motor Insurers’ Bureau

14 June 2007
Issue: 7277 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Byrne v Motor Insurers’ Bureau [2007] EWHC 1268 (QB), [2007] All ER (D) 03 (Jun)

This case concerned the limitation period for the liability of the MIB to satisfy judgments against untraced drivers where the injured party is a minor. This scheme is intended to implement Council Directive (EEC) 84/5. Under the scheme, the limitation period is, in all cases, three years.

Held: the procedure relied on by the UK as implementing the Directive should be subject to a limitation period no less favourable than that which applies to the commencement of proceedings by minors for personal injury in tort against a traced driver (under s 28 of the Limitation Act 1980).

Although the Directive is, in principle, capable of having direct effect, the MIB is not an emanation of the state and so the Directive cannot be enforced directly against it. However, the UK is in sufficiently serious breach of the terms of the Directive so as to give rise, in principle, to a claim for damages.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll