header-logo header-logo

13 November 2008
Issue: 7345 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Employment

Rolls Royce plc v Riddle [2008] IRLR 873

In an application to strike out a claim under rule 18(7)(d) of the Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2004 (SI 2004/1861), cases of failure to actively pursue a claim will fall into one of two categories:

(i) where there has been “intentional and contumelious” default by the claimant (the question arises whether, given such conduct, it is just to allow the claimant to continue to have access to the tribunal for his claim); and

(ii) where there has been inordinate and inexcusable delay such as to give rise to a substantial risk that a fair trial would not be possible or there would be serious prejudice to the respondent (the question arises as to whether or not there can still be fair trial and if there is doubt about that whether the claim should then be prevented from going any further).
 

Issue: 7345 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Stone King—Laura McHugh

Stone King—Laura McHugh

Stone King strengthens Manchester presence with new partner hire

mfg Solicitors—four appointments

mfg Solicitors—four appointments

Sustained growth leads to rapid expansion of law firm’s corporate team

Bermans—James Thornton

Bermans—James Thornton

Bermans bolsters litigation team with senior hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling has sent a jolt through the legal profession after a newly qualified solicitor used an internal AI tool to produce court correspondence containing a fabricated legal citation
A significant data privacy ruling has clarified what counts as valid consent under UK data protection law
Executors may be overlooking billions of pounds in estate assets hidden in forgotten investments and misplaced share certificates
Britain’s booming non-surgical cosmetics market is operating in what some critics describe as a regulatory ‘Wild West’
Family contact disputes are becoming an increasingly prominent feature of Court of Protection litigation
back-to-top-scroll