header-logo header-logo

01 January 2009
Issue: 7350+7351 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Law digest: Employment

R v Chargot (trading as Contract Services) [2008] UKHL 73, [2008] All ER (D) 106 (Dec)
 

When criminal proceedings are brought against an employer under ss 2 and 3 of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974, it is sufficient for the prosecution to prove merely a risk of injury arising from a state of affairs at work (it is not necessary to prove specific breaches of duty by the employer). The onus then passes to the employer to make good the defence of reasonable practicability.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll