header-logo header-logo

01 January 2009
Issue: 7350+7351 / Categories: Features , Tribunals , Employment
printer mail-detail

Law digest: Employment law

Clark v Clark Construction Initiatives Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 1446, [2008] All ER (D) 191 (Dec)

Judicial tribunals have an obligation to give reasons which are “candid, intelligible, transparent and coherent”. Transparency means that properly drawn reasons should make it possible for the reader to find sources, especially but not only sources of law, which are referred to but not recited. While there is no universal test of procedural irregularity, a tribunal’s determination is not vitiated by reference to uncanvassed authorities if these have not been central to and influential in the eventual decision.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll