header-logo header-logo

01 August 2025
Issue: 8127 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 1 August 2025

Conflict of laws

JP Morgan International Finance Ltd v Werealize.ComLtd; Karonis and others v JP Morgan International Finance Ltd [2025] EWHC 1842 (Comm)

The Commercial Court ruled on applications for anti-suit injunctions (ASIs) brought by WeRealize.com Ltd (WRL) and the directors of Viva Wallet Holdings Software Development S.A. (the Directors) to restrain claims commenced by JP Morgan International Finance Ltd against the directors in Greece under Art 919 of the Greek Civil Code. The court held that the directors were entitled to ASI relief in respect of the Greek proceedings on the basis that those proceedings breached an obligation to be implied into cl 33 of the relevant shareholders’ agreement not to bring proceedings in a jurisdiction in which the cl 33 ‘no liability’ provision would not be effective. Accordingly, the Directors were granted ASI relief on this basis. The court rejected the alternate claims for ASI relief, such as quasi-contractual arguments or vexatious and oppressive conduct.


Criminal law

R v Hayes; R v Palombo [2025] UKSC 29

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll