header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 10 December 2021

10 December 2021
Issue: 7960 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Clinical negligence

HTR (acting by his mother and next friend) v Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust [2021] EWHC 3228 (QB), [2021] All ER (D) 03 (Dec)

The Queen’s Bench Division ruled that breach of duty had been established, concerning the claimant’s clinical negligence claim. Four days after an antenatal appointment with Dr S at the defendant’s hospital in 2004 (the relevant date), the claimant had been delivered by emergency Caesarean section, having suffered permanent damage from chronic partial hypoxia which had resulted in asymmetric quadriplegic cerebral palsy. The court held that, as the claimant’s mother (LJR) had raised a concern about reduced foetal movement at the clinic on the relevant date, she had established a breach of duty. Further, in circumstances where the hearing in the present case had taken place 17 years to the day after the events in issue, and where LJR had first prepared a statement eight years after the meeting with Dr S, the court held that, notwithstanding that the critical medical note had recorded active foetal movement,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll