header-logo header-logo

10 December 2021
Issue: 7960 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 10 December 2021

Clinical negligence

HTR (acting by his mother and next friend) v Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust [2021] EWHC 3228 (QB), [2021] All ER (D) 03 (Dec)

The Queen’s Bench Division ruled that breach of duty had been established, concerning the claimant’s clinical negligence claim. Four days after an antenatal appointment with Dr S at the defendant’s hospital in 2004 (the relevant date), the claimant had been delivered by emergency Caesarean section, having suffered permanent damage from chronic partial hypoxia which had resulted in asymmetric quadriplegic cerebral palsy. The court held that, as the claimant’s mother (LJR) had raised a concern about reduced foetal movement at the clinic on the relevant date, she had established a breach of duty. Further, in circumstances where the hearing in the present case had taken place 17 years to the day after the events in issue, and where LJR had first prepared a statement eight years after the meeting with Dr S, the court held that, notwithstanding that the critical medical note had recorded active foetal movement,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll