header-logo header-logo

14 February 2025
Issue: 8104 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 14 February 2025

Costs

Rana and another v Assethold Ltd [2025] UKUT 19 (LC)

The Upper Tribunal found that the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) had erred in its decision regarding three specific items of expenditure and its refusal to award costs under Rule 13(1)(b) of the Tribunal Proceedings (FTT) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013. It determined that the costs for internal decoration of flat 2 and the replacement of a fan in flat 3 were not payable, and that the cost for external decoration was not reasonably incurred. The tribunal also found that the respondent’s conduct was unreasonable and awarded costs to the appellants.

Trappit SA and other companies v GBT Services UK Ltd [2024] EWHC 3285 (Ch)

The court held that the claimants had not provided cogent reasons to depart from the usual rule under CPR 38.6 that a claimant who discontinues is liable for the defendant’s costs incurred up to the date of discontinuance. The court also held that the defendant’s conduct was not sufficiently out of the norm to warrant indemnity costs being awarded.


Evidence

Morris

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll