header-logo header-logo

14 February 2025
Issue: 8104 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 14 February 2025

Costs

Rana and another v Assethold Ltd [2025] UKUT 19 (LC)

The Upper Tribunal found that the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) had erred in its decision regarding three specific items of expenditure and its refusal to award costs under Rule 13(1)(b) of the Tribunal Proceedings (FTT) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013. It determined that the costs for internal decoration of flat 2 and the replacement of a fan in flat 3 were not payable, and that the cost for external decoration was not reasonably incurred. The tribunal also found that the respondent’s conduct was unreasonable and awarded costs to the appellants.

Trappit SA and other companies v GBT Services UK Ltd [2024] EWHC 3285 (Ch)

The court held that the claimants had not provided cogent reasons to depart from the usual rule under CPR 38.6 that a claimant who discontinues is liable for the defendant’s costs incurred up to the date of discontinuance. The court also held that the defendant’s conduct was not sufficiently out of the norm to warrant indemnity costs being awarded.


Evidence

Morris

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll