header-logo header-logo

14 February 2025
Issue: 8104 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 14 February 2025

Costs

Rana and another v Assethold Ltd [2025] UKUT 19 (LC)

The Upper Tribunal found that the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) had erred in its decision regarding three specific items of expenditure and its refusal to award costs under Rule 13(1)(b) of the Tribunal Proceedings (FTT) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013. It determined that the costs for internal decoration of flat 2 and the replacement of a fan in flat 3 were not payable, and that the cost for external decoration was not reasonably incurred. The tribunal also found that the respondent’s conduct was unreasonable and awarded costs to the appellants.

Trappit SA and other companies v GBT Services UK Ltd [2024] EWHC 3285 (Ch)

The court held that the claimants had not provided cogent reasons to depart from the usual rule under CPR 38.6 that a claimant who discontinues is liable for the defendant’s costs incurred up to the date of discontinuance. The court also held that the defendant’s conduct was not sufficiently out of the norm to warrant indemnity costs being awarded.


Evidence

Morris

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll