header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 14 June 2024

14 June 2024
Issue: 8075 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Employment

Boohene and others v The Royal Parks Ltd [2024] EWCA Civ 583, [2024] All ER (D) 106 (May)

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, dismissed the claimant’s appeal on the basis of the arguments raised in the respondent’s notice. The respondent was the charity responsible for the management of the Royal Parks through contract workers. The appellants were 16 contract workers with the respondent. They brought a claim at the employment tribunal (ET) for indirect racial discrimination contrary to s 41 of the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010). The alleged discrimination consisted of failure to pay the appellants, as contract workers, the London Living Wage (LLW). The ET allowed the claim and the EAT overturned the decision. The appellants appealed. By a respondent’s notice, the respondent sought to revive three of its grounds which the EAT rejected. The court held, among other things, that the discrimination complained of by the appellants had not fallen within the scope of s 41(1). The appellants could have no claim against the respondent under

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll