header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 14 November 2025

14 November 2025
Issue: 8139 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Costs

Hood v Southern Land Securities Ltd and another company [2025] UKUT 378 (LC)

The UK Upper Tribunal, Lands Chamber (UT) dismissed Mr Hood’s appeal against a costs order made by the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) in land registration proceedings. The FTT had awarded Mr Hood costs up to 5 February 2025 but ordered him to pay his landlords’ costs of £10,181 incurred after that date. The costs order was made on the basis that Mr Hood had unreasonably refused the landlords’ settlement offer, which would have granted him a lease of the loft space at a peppercorn rent. The UT found that the outcome Mr Hood achieved at the FTT hearing (an expanded demise under his existing lease) was not better than what had been offered in settlement. His refusal to accept the offer unless the landlords proved they had not illegally acquired the freehold was unreasonable, as this matter was extraneous to the proceedings. The UT rejected the respondents’ application for costs of the appeal, noting that costs are not normally awarded

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

London firm announces acquisition of corporate team

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Head of corporate appointed following Teesside merger

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Firm expands into banking and finance sector with newly appointed head of banking

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll