header-logo header-logo

14 November 2025
Issue: 8139 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 14 November 2025

Costs

Hood v Southern Land Securities Ltd and another company [2025] UKUT 378 (LC)

The UK Upper Tribunal, Lands Chamber (UT) dismissed Mr Hood’s appeal against a costs order made by the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) in land registration proceedings. The FTT had awarded Mr Hood costs up to 5 February 2025 but ordered him to pay his landlords’ costs of £10,181 incurred after that date. The costs order was made on the basis that Mr Hood had unreasonably refused the landlords’ settlement offer, which would have granted him a lease of the loft space at a peppercorn rent. The UT found that the outcome Mr Hood achieved at the FTT hearing (an expanded demise under his existing lease) was not better than what had been offered in settlement. His refusal to accept the offer unless the landlords proved they had not illegally acquired the freehold was unreasonable, as this matter was extraneous to the proceedings. The UT rejected the respondents’ application for costs of the appeal, noting that costs are not normally

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll