header-logo header-logo

14 April 2021
Issue: 7928 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 16 April 2021

Contempt of court

HM Advocate v Murray [2021] HCJ 2, 2021 Scot (D) 28/3

High Court of Justiciary: In contempt proceedings concerning articles the respondent published on his website in the wake of the arrest and subsequent prosecution of Alex Salmond, on an indictment containing charges of alleged sexual offences against several women, said to have been committed whilst he was First Minister of Scotland, the court held that an article the respondent published on 30 March 2020 did not breach an order under s 4(2) of the Contempt of Court Act 1981 which the court imposed on 23 March 2020 in respect of proceedings against a juror; the part of the petition alleging contraventions of ss 1 and 2 of the 1981 Act in that that there was a substantial risk of prejudice to the proceedings in HM Advocate v Salmond created by the respondent’s publications of 23 August 2019 and 18 January 2020 must be refused, no justification having been offered for delaying bringing the petition until a month after

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll