header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 171, Issue 7928

16 April 2021
IN THIS ISSUE
Rules of origin complicates trade after Brexit
2021 ‘big year’ for cryptocurrency regulation
Costs warning for the non-negotiators
‘Logical’ rules breached and replaced
Ever Given & beyond: Michael L Nash takes a voyage through the history of troubled ships at sea
Michael Zander QC reports on the George Floyd case, now nearing its end
Courts to get Ritzy; negotiate or else; tribunal rules amended; hold the stat demands!; mediation enticer; insolvency moves revealed.
HHJ Karen Walden-Smith examines the importance of restraint when raising allegations of fundamental dishonesty
Defining provenance post-Brexit: Paul Henty charts the often-painful experience of tackling rules of origin
Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll