header-logo header-logo

15 April 2021 / Michael L Nash
Issue: 7928 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Suez Canal: pushing the boat out

45625
Ever Given & beyond: Michael L Nash takes a voyage through the history of troubled ships at sea

The recent major disruption to the use of the Suez Canal by a mega container ship, the Ever Given, has inevitably called to mind other blockages in the 152-year history of the canal.

No fewer than 369 ships had been queueing in the canal because of the recent disruption; the legal consequences may be different in each of them. It would be difficult to consider one class action.

The canal had originally been owned and operated by the Suez Canal Company, the major shareholders being the British and French governments. In 1956, in the vanguard of Arab nationalism, the new Egyptian leader, Gamal Abdel Nasser, had nationalised the canal. This had immediate and long-term consequences, for the Egyptians now faced operating the canal themselves, without necessarily having the resources to do so. Now, Egyptian crew take the ship through the canal, and, at the time the Ever Given went onto a sandbank,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll