header-logo header-logo

Suez Canal: pushing the boat out

15 April 2021 / Michael L Nash
Issue: 7928 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail
45625
Ever Given & beyond: Michael L Nash takes a voyage through the history of troubled ships at sea

The recent major disruption to the use of the Suez Canal by a mega container ship, the Ever Given, has inevitably called to mind other blockages in the 152-year history of the canal.

No fewer than 369 ships had been queueing in the canal because of the recent disruption; the legal consequences may be different in each of them. It would be difficult to consider one class action.

The canal had originally been owned and operated by the Suez Canal Company, the major shareholders being the British and French governments. In 1956, in the vanguard of Arab nationalism, the new Egyptian leader, Gamal Abdel Nasser, had nationalised the canal. This had immediate and long-term consequences, for the Egyptians now faced operating the canal themselves, without necessarily having the resources to do so. Now, Egyptian crew take the ship through the canal, and, at the time the Ever Given went onto a sandbank,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll