header-logo header-logo

Suez Canal: pushing the boat out

15 April 2021 / Michael L Nash
Issue: 7928 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail
45625
Ever Given & beyond: Michael L Nash takes a voyage through the history of troubled ships at sea

The recent major disruption to the use of the Suez Canal by a mega container ship, the Ever Given, has inevitably called to mind other blockages in the 152-year history of the canal.

No fewer than 369 ships had been queueing in the canal because of the recent disruption; the legal consequences may be different in each of them. It would be difficult to consider one class action.

The canal had originally been owned and operated by the Suez Canal Company, the major shareholders being the British and French governments. In 1956, in the vanguard of Arab nationalism, the new Egyptian leader, Gamal Abdel Nasser, had nationalised the canal. This had immediate and long-term consequences, for the Egyptians now faced operating the canal themselves, without necessarily having the resources to do so. Now, Egyptian crew take the ship through the canal, and, at the time the Ever Given went onto a sandbank,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll