header-logo header-logo

15 April 2021 / Michael L Nash
Issue: 7928 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Suez Canal: pushing the boat out

45625
Ever Given & beyond: Michael L Nash takes a voyage through the history of troubled ships at sea

The recent major disruption to the use of the Suez Canal by a mega container ship, the Ever Given, has inevitably called to mind other blockages in the 152-year history of the canal.

No fewer than 369 ships had been queueing in the canal because of the recent disruption; the legal consequences may be different in each of them. It would be difficult to consider one class action.

The canal had originally been owned and operated by the Suez Canal Company, the major shareholders being the British and French governments. In 1956, in the vanguard of Arab nationalism, the new Egyptian leader, Gamal Abdel Nasser, had nationalised the canal. This had immediate and long-term consequences, for the Egyptians now faced operating the canal themselves, without necessarily having the resources to do so. Now, Egyptian crew take the ship through the canal, and, at the time the Ever Given went onto a sandbank,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll