header-logo header-logo

Rules of origin: a (Percy) pig of a problem?

14 April 2021 / Paul Henty
Issue: 7928 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Commercial , EU
printer mail-detail
45616
Defining provenance post-Brexit: Paul Henty charts the often-painful experience of tackling rules of origin
  • Following Brexit, a wider section of the business community is now wrestling with the complexities of rules of origin—the criteria for determining the national source of a product and its components—and their application to particular types of goods.

Back in 2016 when the two sides of the Brexit debate were slugging it out, much was made by the proponents of ‘Remain’ of the impact that tariffs would have in the event of a no-deal Brexit. It was pointed out that EU-UK trade falling back on World Trade Organization (WTO) terms would mean that tariffs would need to be paid on imports into the UK and exports to the EU27. This factor was advanced as one of the key reasons not to leave the European Union.

Perhaps in hindsight, those who opposed Brexit should have spent more time highlighting the complexities of ‘rules of origin’, as these may have served

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll