header-logo header-logo

14 April 2021 / Paul Henty
Issue: 7928 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Commercial , EU
printer mail-detail

Rules of origin: a (Percy) pig of a problem?

45616
Defining provenance post-Brexit: Paul Henty charts the often-painful experience of tackling rules of origin
  • Following Brexit, a wider section of the business community is now wrestling with the complexities of rules of origin—the criteria for determining the national source of a product and its components—and their application to particular types of goods.

Back in 2016 when the two sides of the Brexit debate were slugging it out, much was made by the proponents of ‘Remain’ of the impact that tariffs would have in the event of a no-deal Brexit. It was pointed out that EU-UK trade falling back on World Trade Organization (WTO) terms would mean that tariffs would need to be paid on imports into the UK and exports to the EU27. This factor was advanced as one of the key reasons not to leave the European Union.

Perhaps in hindsight, those who opposed Brexit should have spent more time highlighting the complexities of ‘rules of origin’, as these may have served

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll