header-logo header-logo

Rules of origin: a (Percy) pig of a problem?

14 April 2021 / Paul Henty
Issue: 7928 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Commercial , EU
printer mail-detail
45616
Defining provenance post-Brexit: Paul Henty charts the often-painful experience of tackling rules of origin
  • Following Brexit, a wider section of the business community is now wrestling with the complexities of rules of origin—the criteria for determining the national source of a product and its components—and their application to particular types of goods.

Back in 2016 when the two sides of the Brexit debate were slugging it out, much was made by the proponents of ‘Remain’ of the impact that tariffs would have in the event of a no-deal Brexit. It was pointed out that EU-UK trade falling back on World Trade Organization (WTO) terms would mean that tariffs would need to be paid on imports into the UK and exports to the EU27. This factor was advanced as one of the key reasons not to leave the European Union.

Perhaps in hindsight, those who opposed Brexit should have spent more time highlighting the complexities of ‘rules of origin’, as these may have served

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll