header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: cyber law & cryptoassets

16 April 2021
Issue: 7928 / Categories: Legal News , Cyber , Technology , Financial services litigation
printer mail-detail
45611
2021 ‘big year’ for cryptocurrency regulation

As the importance of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies in the financial markets continues to rise, so too do calls for increased regulation.

Writing in NLJ this week, Celso de Azevedo and Marc Samuels, both of 36 Group, explore the most recent regulatory developments both in the UK and US. They note that Mastercard is integrating Bitcoin into its payment systems, BNY Mellon has announced plans to hold Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies for its clients and Tesla recently bought $1.5bn of Bitcoin for its corporate treasury.

‘These events reflect a surge of institutional interest in the emerging Bitcoin and cryptoasset class,’ they write. And ‘just as we have seen growth in value, so too have we seen a flurry of regulatory and political activity in connection with cryptocurrency in the first quarter of 2021.’

Their article looks at recent developments on regulation and explains why 2021 could be ‘a big year for cryptocurrency regulation’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll