header-logo header-logo

16 April 2021
Issue: 7928 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Civil way , CPR
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: hikes in court fees

45619
Costs warning for the non-negotiators

A case that sounded alarm bells on costs for non-negotiating parties attracts the attention of NLJ columnist Stephen Gold in this week’s Civil Way.

In the financial remedies case, LM v DM, a wife was held to have made no serious attempt to negotiate openly and reasonably, and was deprived of half of her costs as a result.  Gold predicts a tougher stance on costs in future from financial remedies courts judges where parties hold back on negotiating.

Gold also covers hikes in 133 court fees, tribunal rules, the family mediation voucher scheme and the Coronavirus ‘respite’ for companies and directors on wrongful trading legislation. For these, and other nuggets, read Gold here.

Issue: 7928 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Civil way , CPR
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Caroline Barker & Tom Walker

Browne Jacobson—Caroline Barker & Tom Walker

Browne Jacobson recruits regulatory experts Caroline Barker and Tom Walker to bolster health, government and corporates practices

Jackson Lees Group—Paul Harrison, Helen Innes & Sorcha McMullan

Jackson Lees Group—Paul Harrison, Helen Innes & Sorcha McMullan

Partner and paralegals bolster clinical negligence team at Jackson Lees Group

Stone King—Manchester

Stone King—Manchester

Stone King triples Manchester footprint with office move as law firm’s rapid growth journey continues

NEWS
Group claims, disputed costs and judicial recruitment dominate the latest courtroom round-up
Landlords face fresh registration duties as procedural reforms reshape the civil courts
Sanctions can derail commercial disputes long before judgment, making early planning essential
Pressure is mounting for a dedicated UK AI law, but deciding what it should achieve remains the central challenge
Legal professional privilege has checked the SRA’s investigative powers, exposing difficult questions about tackling suspected abusive litigation
back-to-top-scroll