header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 16 December 2022

16 December 2022
Issue: 8007 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Competition

Mastercard Inc and others v Merricks [2022] EWCA Civ 1568, [2022] All ER (D) 04 (Dec)

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, dismissed the appellant’s appeal against the decision of the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) in relation to the determination of the ‘domicile date’ in collective proceedings. The CAT found that the domicile date was the date on which the claim form had been submitted. The court held, among other things, that the overall purpose of the collective proceedings regime was to provide access to justice for individual claimants who would not otherwise be able to obtain legal redress. The CAT had unfettered discretion to specify the domicile date, save that in exercising the discretion the CAT could not disregard that overall statutory purpose. The CAT clearly did not do so.


Disclosure

Republic of Mozambique v Credit Suisse International and others [2022] EWHC 3054 (Comm), [2022] All ER (D) 08 (Dec)

The Commercial Court ruled on an application made in the course of the claimant state’s claim, against the defendant financial

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll