header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 16 February 2024

16 February 2024
Issue: 8059 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Human rights

R (on the application of Castellucci) v Gender Recognition Panel and other cases [2024] EWHC 54 (Admin), [2024] All ER (D) 13 (Feb)

The Administrative Court dismissed the consolidated claims by the claimant for: (i) permission to appeal in the Family Division under s 8 of the Gender Recognition Act 2004 against the defendant panel’s refusal to grant a gender recognition certificate (GRC) to specify their acquired gender as non-binary; and (ii) an application for judicial review against the panel’s decision. The claimant, a citizen of California, had moved to the UK on a Tier 1 ‘Global Talent’ visa. The claimant had been diagnosed with gender dysphoria and was legally recognised as non-binary by the State of California. Their certificate of live birth was also amended to change their sex from male to ‘non-binary’. The claimant’s challenge against the panel’s decision was grounded on: (i) whether ‘on an ordinary construction’ of the Act, it permitted ‘the recognition of a foreign-acquired gender that could not otherwise be obtained under English law’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll