header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 17 January 2025

17 January 2025
Issue: 8100 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Contract

Salem and another v Salem and others [2024] EWHC 3311 (Ch)

This was an application seeking summary dismissal of an application to enforce a term in a settlement deed. The court held that the relevant term (clause 6.5) was an unenforceable ‘agreement to agree’ on expert determination, as there were no sufficiently objective criteria to assess the reasonableness of the parties’ endeavours to agree a binding process. Even if clause 6.5 was binding, the court found that it imposed a time-limited obligation on the parties to agree a binding process for expert determination, unless an extension was agreed in writing.


Costs

Lewis v Francis and another [2025] EWHC 17 (Admin)

The primary question was whether the magistrates' court was correct in law to determine that it had the power to order costs against the applicant where the finding of an unnecessary act was on the basis that the evidence presented was too weak to satisfy the criminal standard of proof. The court ruled that the district judge's decision to order

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Head of corporate promoted to director

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Firm strengthens international arbitration team with key London hire

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

NEWS
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
back-to-top-scroll