header-logo header-logo

17 May 2024
Issue: 8071 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 17 May 2024

Immigration

Public Law Project v Information Commissioner [2024] All ER (D) 178 (Feb), [2024] UKUT 71 (AAC)

The Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) (the UT) dismissed the appellant’s (PLP’s) appeal against a decision by the First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) (FTT) that the Information Commissioner’s (IC’s) decision notice had been in accordance with the law. Under s 31 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FIA 2000), information was exempt if its disclosure would, or would be likely to, prejudice, among other things, the prevention or detection of crime and the operation of immigration control. PLP had requested information from the Home Office (HO), concerning the criteria used by the triage model used by HO’s marriage referral assessment unit, which was responsible for initial enquiries in relation to the sham marriage referral and investigation scheme. HO had responded that FIA 2000, s 31(1)(a) had been engaged to withhold the criteria that the triage model used, and that HO had not had any further information concerning the impact of the triage model on different

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll