header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 18 November 2022

18 November 2022
Issue: 8003 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Abduction

Re X (a child) (child abduction: habitual residence) [2022] EWCA Civ 1423, [2022] All ER (D) 10 (Nov)

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, ruled on the appeal against an order in proceedings brought by a father under the Hague Child Abduction Convention 1980 for the summary return to Germany of his minor son, X. X’s father and mother had a short relationship. X had lived in Uganda with his mother and the father had lived in Germany. In January 2020, the mother brought X to the UK and in July 2020, she had claimed asylum. Thereafter, the father had filed an application with the Family Division for the summary return of X to Germany. The judge had granted the father’s application on the ground that X was habitually resident in Germany. The mother argued that the judge was wrong to find that X’s habitual residence was Germany. The court held, among other things, that the court found as a fact that the date of retention was July 2021.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll