header-logo header-logo

18 February 2021
Issue: 7921 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 19 February 2021

Court of Protection

Re TA (recording of hearings; communication with court office) A local authority v TA and others [2021] EWCOP 3, [2021] All ER (D) 91 (Jan)

In proceedings concerning an elderly woman with a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s dementia (GA), for whom the local authority was responsible, and who was currently cared for at home by her adult son (TA), the Court of Protection made an ‘exceptional’ order, namely an injunction, to restrain TA from communicating with the court office by email and telephone. Further, in circumstances where TA had allegedly referred to himself as a ‘Wikileaks Wannabe’, and where (in the context of remote hearings due to the COVID-19 pandemic) he contended that he was ‘outside the jurisdiction of the court’ and could record conversations as he wished while in ‘his jurisdiction’ (his home), the court indicated that it would not accede to his application for permission to record the court hearings, concerning GA. It considered that there would be a ‘publication’ of any recorded information from the proceedings, and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll