header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 19 February 2021

18 February 2021
Issue: 7921 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Court of Protection

Re TA (recording of hearings; communication with court office) A local authority v TA and others [2021] EWCOP 3, [2021] All ER (D) 91 (Jan)

In proceedings concerning an elderly woman with a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s dementia (GA), for whom the local authority was responsible, and who was currently cared for at home by her adult son (TA), the Court of Protection made an ‘exceptional’ order, namely an injunction, to restrain TA from communicating with the court office by email and telephone. Further, in circumstances where TA had allegedly referred to himself as a ‘Wikileaks Wannabe’, and where (in the context of remote hearings due to the COVID-19 pandemic) he contended that he was ‘outside the jurisdiction of the court’ and could record conversations as he wished while in ‘his jurisdiction’ (his home), the court indicated that it would not accede to his application for permission to record the court hearings, concerning GA. It considered that there would be a ‘publication’ of any recorded information from the proceedings, and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ben Daniels, DAC Beachcroft

NLJ Career Profile: Ben Daniels, DAC Beachcroft

Ben Daniels, newly elected as the next senior partner of DAC Beachcroft, reflects on his leadership inspiration and considers an impish alternative career

Osbornes Law—Lee Henderson

Osbornes Law—Lee Henderson

Family team bolstered by latest partner hire

Freeths—Graeme Danby & John Jeffreys

Freeths—Graeme Danby & John Jeffreys

Firms strengthens national restructuring and insolvency practice with leadership appointments

NEWS
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School highlights a turbulent end to 2025 in the civil courts, from the looming appeal in Mazur to judicial frustration with ever-expanding bundles, in his final NLJ 'The insider' column of the year
Antonia Glover of Quinn Emanuel outlines sweeping transparency reforms following the work of the Transparency and Open Justice Board in this week's NLJ
In NLJ this week, Ian Smith, emeritus professor at UEA, explores major developments in employment law from the Supreme Court and appellate courts
back-to-top-scroll