header-logo header-logo

19 January 2024
Issue: 8055 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 19 January 2024

Family proceedings

MB v KB and others [2024] All ER (D) 01 (Jan), [2023] EWHC 3299 (Fam)

The High Court, Family Division, ruled on various costs points in dispute in respect of an application by the applicant father in which he had sought the summary return of the second and third respondent children to Qatar following their removal to the UK by the respondent mother. That application had been dismissed. It fell to be determined, among other things, whether: (i) an order that the father should have paid those costs should have been granted; and (ii) the father should have paid the costs of his unsuccessful application for a disclosure order against the Home Office. The court held, among other things, that: (i) the father had not behaved reprehensibly in the conduct of the litigation or otherwise taken an unreasonable stance and there would be no order for costs; and (ii) the application could not have been properly categorised as either amounting to reprehensible behaviour on behalf of the father or as representing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll