header-logo header-logo

19 January 2024
Issue: 8055 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 19 January 2024

Family proceedings

MB v KB and others [2024] All ER (D) 01 (Jan), [2023] EWHC 3299 (Fam)

The High Court, Family Division, ruled on various costs points in dispute in respect of an application by the applicant father in which he had sought the summary return of the second and third respondent children to Qatar following their removal to the UK by the respondent mother. That application had been dismissed. It fell to be determined, among other things, whether: (i) an order that the father should have paid those costs should have been granted; and (ii) the father should have paid the costs of his unsuccessful application for a disclosure order against the Home Office. The court held, among other things, that: (i) the father had not behaved reprehensibly in the conduct of the litigation or otherwise taken an unreasonable stance and there would be no order for costs; and (ii) the application could not have been properly categorised as either amounting to reprehensible behaviour on behalf of the father or as representing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll