header-logo header-logo

02 February 2024
Issue: 8057 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 2 February 2024

Deportation

Secretary of State for the Home Department v AA (Poland) [2024] EWCA Civ 18, [2024] All ER (D) 83 (Jan)

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, allowed the appellant Secretary of State’s appeal from a decision of the Upper Tribunal (UT) which had dismissed its appeal and concluded that the First-tier Tribunal (FtT) made no error of law. The appellant sought to deport the respondent, an EU citizen who had committed serious sexual offences in the UK. The FtT and UT concluded that the respondent’s removal from the UK would infringe his rights under the EU Treaties as implemented by the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the 2016 Regulations) and his right to respect for private and family life under art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The appellant alleged that the: (i) FtT had erred in law by misapplying the 2016 Regulations; and (ii) the judge wrongly treated the issue of proportionality arising under art 8 of the ECHR as identical to the one arising under

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll