header-logo header-logo

02 February 2024
Issue: 8057 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 2 February 2024

Deportation

Secretary of State for the Home Department v AA (Poland) [2024] EWCA Civ 18, [2024] All ER (D) 83 (Jan)

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, allowed the appellant Secretary of State’s appeal from a decision of the Upper Tribunal (UT) which had dismissed its appeal and concluded that the First-tier Tribunal (FtT) made no error of law. The appellant sought to deport the respondent, an EU citizen who had committed serious sexual offences in the UK. The FtT and UT concluded that the respondent’s removal from the UK would infringe his rights under the EU Treaties as implemented by the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the 2016 Regulations) and his right to respect for private and family life under art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The appellant alleged that the: (i) FtT had erred in law by misapplying the 2016 Regulations; and (ii) the judge wrongly treated the issue of proportionality arising under art 8 of the ECHR as identical to the one arising under

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll