header-logo header-logo

02 February 2024
Issue: 8057 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 2 February 2024

Deportation

Secretary of State for the Home Department v AA (Poland) [2024] EWCA Civ 18, [2024] All ER (D) 83 (Jan)

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, allowed the appellant Secretary of State’s appeal from a decision of the Upper Tribunal (UT) which had dismissed its appeal and concluded that the First-tier Tribunal (FtT) made no error of law. The appellant sought to deport the respondent, an EU citizen who had committed serious sexual offences in the UK. The FtT and UT concluded that the respondent’s removal from the UK would infringe his rights under the EU Treaties as implemented by the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the 2016 Regulations) and his right to respect for private and family life under art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The appellant alleged that the: (i) FtT had erred in law by misapplying the 2016 Regulations; and (ii) the judge wrongly treated the issue of proportionality arising under art 8 of the ECHR as identical to the one arising under

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll